Would The Apostle Paul Have Used Facebook?

What would the Apostle Paul have thought of Facebook?

The Apostle Paul Writing His Facebook Status by Rembrandt

Would he, like some, call Facebook the Devil in disguise? Or would he, like some 500 million others today, log in, change his status, and check in on his friends?

Some might say the ancient theologian was far too serious for such frivolity.

But I’m not sure.

Eugene C. Scott joins Mike in writing A Daily Bible Conversation twice a week.

TODAY’S READING (click here to view today’s reading online)

Jeremiah 51:54-52:34

Titus 3:1-15

Psalm 100:1-5

Proverbs 26:18-19


Proverbs 26:18-19: Some might interpret this proverb as a slam against humor. Some see God, faith, the Bible, and life as so serious there is no place for joking. That kind of thinking is what made Mark Twain, the man with a fabulous sense of humor, think twice about going to heaven. He worried playing the same tune on a harp might be a tad boring.

We do our God no favors denying him a sense of humor. Thus, this proverb is not a prohibition against joking, but rather against using humor to cover up our true ideas or feelings.

If you’ve found A Daily Bible Conversation helpful, share it with your friends. Forward your daily email or send them a link to the website: www.bibleconversation.com.


I believe the Apostle Paul would have embraced social media such as Facebook (though probably with a wise, critical eye) because he was an innovator, especially when it came to communicating the truth of Jesus Christ.

Not many people could read or write in Paul’s day, and letters were exchanged mainly between educated government officials, yet Paul wrote personal letters to his friends and common everyday folk (thirteen that we know of including Titus and Timothy). Some say that personal letter writing as we know it today (or used to before email and Facebook) did not really gain ground until about 1500AD. Paul was well before his time. Surely he would have seen this technology as a way to talk about Jesus.

Further, I believe Paul would have logged on because he valued relationships. Paul is famous for his theology. But above all he valued people and friendships.

Paul tells his friends in Thessolinica, “We loved you so much that we were delighted to share with you not only the gospel of God but our lives as well, because you had become so dear to us.” And he greets, names as friends, affectionately mentions, and encourages over 80 people by name in his letters. There are many others he does not name. In Titus he mentions Artemus, Tychicus, Zenas, and Apollos. Not one New Testament letter of Paul’s does not contain a warm personal greeting to some person or group. Paul’s Facebook friend list would have been almost as long as any teenage girl’s.

Like his mentor and master, Jesus, Paul cared about people. He cared about their health, families, faith, relationships, beliefs, work, theology, ideas, politics, sex lives, kids, marriages, and, especially, their eternal destinies. And he loved them so deeply he suffered physical pain and persecution to be with them. He traveled miles, wrote difficult letters, prayed, argued, taught, wept, and was imprisoned for their sake and the gospel.

Despite our modern ability to connect, many people are lonely. A recent study reported 67% of Americans are spending less time with friends than ever. And for us within the church, whom Jesus commanded to love one another, we often value doctrine and structures and systems and budgets and buildings over relationships. This must break our relational God’s heart.

I have a new friend I met through email who wrote that, as important as doctrine is, he believes right doctrine follows right relationships. I agree. For that matter, Jesus seemed to believe that love was our first doctrinal calling. Paul certainly held fast to the cord of truth. But he seldom strangled strangers with it. Rather he laid it out within the loving friendships he developed.

As the modern saying goes, “Would you rather be right or be in relationship?”

My answer, “I’d rather be in right relationships.”

Would Paul have used Facebook? Though I asked the question, I’m not sure it really matters. I just asked it to focus on this fact: Paul never forgot how important relationships were. So, where Facebook would have fostered them, he would have logged on. And where Facebook hindered knowing and loving the people God placed in his life, he may have said, “Facebook is the devil in disguise.”

1. Which passage spoke most to you?

2. What did the four have in common?

3. What social networks do you use?

4. Do they deepen or distance you from relationships?

If you’re reading this blog on Facebook and you’d like to join the conversation, click here. www.bibleconversation.com.

Eugene co-pastors The Neighborhood Church in Littleton, CO and writes a blog eugenesgodsightings.blogspot.com


Filed under Uncategorized

4 responses to “Would The Apostle Paul Have Used Facebook?

  1. webchurchgbg

    I think it’s certain that Jesus, Paul and the other Apostles would’ve used social media, had it existed when they lived.

    They went where people where, and today a lot of people are on Facebook and other social networks.

    The letters serve very much the same purpose, but communication was slower. Paul’s letters were copied and spread. Is that any different to sharing blog posts though tweets and status updates?

    The people who never met Paul face to face, got to know him though his letters. Is that any different to getting to know a person through IM, chat, apart from the speed of the communication? One could say that the Paul we get to know in his letters is his avatar, his non-physical presence.

    • Good points. I wonder how they would then encourage those people to move beyond virtual relationships.

      Personally, I am enjoying my blog and Facebook connections but also hope that people have real flesh and blood communities to plug with.

      • webchurchgbg

        I agree with you. There’s something about meeting face-to-face that’s lost online.

        But I must point out that online is no less ‘real’ than offline. My online friends, the ones I’ve never met face-to-face, are real people, and it’s a real friendship. Unreal people are the ones in fiction: James Bond, Frodo Baggins, Harry Potter… those are unreal.

        That said, I think it’s important to understand that virtual contacts, being just as real as face-to face contacts, aren’t less important, only different. But in the end I think Christians need to come together face-to-face.

      • Excellent point about reality and the importance of connecting by whatever means. On-line connections are real and different, really different (just kidding). But seriously your point makes me realize that we must then approach each relationship, be it on-line, by phone, letter, or face-to-face, according to its kind. What can we give in each and what can we receive in each? Each has its own built in applications and limitations.

        Because I am a fiction author, I would bring some of the same quibbles and nuance about being real to your comment about fictional characters. They too have a reality about them, or the best of them do. They show us who we really are or could be. Real here means not alive but true to life, ringing with a reality that draws us in and speaks to us.

        Great conversation. Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s